<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Public Domain Works</title>
	<link>http://www.publicdomainworks.net</link>
	<description>Building a registry of sound recordings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public understanding of the &#8216;public domain&#8217; by mhholloway</title>
		<link>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2007/04/20/public-understanding-of-the-public-domain/#comment-2121</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2007/04/20/public-understanding-of-the-public-domain/#comment-2121</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;That's good to know, Rufus, thanks very much. Assumed we'd be educating the general publicm but suppose we also need to re-educate the legal profession on the latent merits of the public domain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good to know, Rufus, thanks very much. Assumed we&#8217;d be educating the general publicm but suppose we also need to re-educate the legal profession on the latent merits of the public domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public understanding of the &#8216;public domain&#8217; by rgrp</title>
		<link>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2007/04/20/public-understanding-of-the-public-domain/#comment-872</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2007/04/20/public-understanding-of-the-public-domain/#comment-872</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think our usage of the term 'public domain' depends on an 'emerging' notion -- rather the IP-expert solicitor seems to be using the term in a rather special (and unusual) way. For example check out the &lt;a href="http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p10_duration" rel="nofollow"&gt;UK Copyright Service&lt;/a&gt; who write:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. What happens when copyright expires?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the term of copyright protection has expired, the work falls into the public domain. This means that the work, has effectively become public property and may be used freely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think our usage of the term &#8216;public domain&#8217; depends on an &#8216;emerging&#8217; notion &#8212; rather the IP-expert solicitor seems to be using the term in a rather special (and unusual) way. For example check out the <a href="http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p10_duration" rel="nofollow">UK Copyright Service</a> who write:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>2. What happens when copyright expires?</p>
<p>When the term of copyright protection has expired, the work falls into the public domain. This means that the work, has effectively become public property and may be used freely.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Composer Data by Public Domain Works &#187; Some Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2006/05/25/composer-data/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.publicdomainworks.net/2006/05/25/composer-data/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Composers whose works are out of copyright. Of the 1083 composers listed in the data kindly donated to us by Philip Harper we estimate that, as of January 1st 2007: Out of Copyright: 263 [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Composers whose works are out of copyright. Of the 1083 composers listed in the data kindly donated to us by Philip Harper we estimate that, as of January 1st 2007: Out of Copyright: 263 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
